Faculty Senate Bill 11-A-23 begins here
When an individual is on one-semester leave at full pay, departments are expected to make appropriate adjustments in course offerings and faculty loads to maintain their responsibility to serve students. Such arrangements must be approved by the dean. In those cases where appropriate adjustments cannot be made within existing resources, additional resources may be provided by the college dean or the Provost. The awarding of the sabbatical will be contingent upon the approval of suitable arrangements. When an individual is on leave for the entire academic year at half pay, the remaining one half of the salary will be made available for part-time replacement.
Applicants should indicate the relevance of their proposals to University goals and department objectives, including the enhancement of academic programs and instruction, and the professional growth of the faculty member. The objectives of the sabbatical leave should be clearly defined, and the proposed use of time, including travel, should be justified with reference to these objectives. The itinerary of any proposed travel should be included. If the proposal requires a formal relationship with another institution or agency, these details must have full endorsement of the outside group.
In addition, there should be evidence relating to the quality of the proposal and the qualifications of the applicant to achieve the proposal's objectives. Such evidence will typically include a bibliography of past publications, an account of relevant professional activities, and supporting letters from colleagues at the University.
Supporting letters from colleagues outside the University are appropriate when another institution or agency is involved. Finally, sabbatical proposals should indicate substantial promise of success. Evidence should be included indicating the likelihood that the project can be completed in the allotted period of time and that the proposed use of time is sufficient to achieve the stated objectives. If a book or article is planned, evidence that it is publishable or will receive professional distribution should be included. If a new program is to be developed, there should be evidence that it will be instituted when completed. If academic respecialization or post-doctoral study is intended, there should be evidence that the faculty member's newly acquired knowledge and skills will be put to use in the classroom or in other professional activities.
Applicants are responsible for the submission of their Record of Service form and other appropriate documentation.
University-wide guidelines are followed in the assessment of applications for a sabbatical leave. In general, consideration should be given to the following:
Faculty desiring sabbatical leave should submit their applications, including all supporting materials, to the department chairperson for review at the department level.
Recommendations from the department chairperson should be submitted to the dean for review and recommendation by the College Sabbatical Review Committee.
Recommendations from the dean should be submitted to the Provost for review and recommendation by the University Promotion Committee.
Recommendations from the Provost should be submitted to the President, who will submit the final recommendations to the Board of Regents.
Applicants should be notified of the action of the Board of Regents by the President.
Within sixty days after returning to regular employment, recipients of a sabbatical leave will submit three copies of a final report to the respective department chairperson. The final report should contain a brief summary of the proposal, a review of the objectives, an assessment of the accomplishment, and copies of articles, monographs or creative works prepared during the sabbatical. The chairperson will retain one copy of the report for department files and forward the remaining two copies of the report to the dean. The dean will retain one copy for the college files and forward the remaining copy to the Provost. The Provost will forward an acceptance of the report to the individual faculty member and send copies to the department chairperson, dean and President.
Procedures contain portions of:Faculty Senate Bill 85-A-05, approved by Faculty Senate Apr. 1985, by Board of Regents June 1985Amended by Faculty Senate Bill 11-A-23, approved by Faculty Senate April 20, 2011, by President April 20, 2011, Posted for 15 Day Review April 2011